<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex and Status: Twitter and Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.docuverse.com/2009/02/07/sex-and-status-twitter-and-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.docuverse.com/2009/02/07/sex-and-status-twitter-and-facebook/</link>
	<description>Don Park's Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:18:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: donpark</title>
		<link>http://blog.docuverse.com/2009/02/07/sex-and-status-twitter-and-facebook/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>donpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.docuverse.com/?p=190#comment-501</guid>
		<description>@fhwang, I just followed you on twitter so you&#039;ll tweet more often. :-)

I think most Twitter users are still in &#039;explorer&#039; mode, more willing to try new sources, where most avid RSS users are now in &#039;gardener&#039; mode where subscription is a question of time budget and interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fhwang, I just followed you on twitter so you&#8217;ll tweet more often. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think most Twitter users are still in &#8216;explorer&#8217; mode, more willing to try new sources, where most avid RSS users are now in &#8216;gardener&#8217; mode where subscription is a question of time budget and interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Hwang</title>
		<link>http://blog.docuverse.com/2009/02/07/sex-and-status-twitter-and-facebook/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Hwang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.docuverse.com/?p=190#comment-500</guid>
		<description>Interesting distinction, Don. Reminds me somewhat of the Google/Yahoo! dichotomy and the fact that some have said that&#039;s gendered too ...

I&#039;d agree: I consider FB status messages more intimate than Tweets. One big reason is that FB has very different defaults concerning privacy. And, yes, Twitter is very much a medium of self-promotion, whether your audience is 10 friends or 10,000 strangers. Not much different than a blog in that sense.

Though for some crazy reason I think I have more Twitter followers than people who sub to my RSS feed, and I&#039;ve only ever tweeted once. Not sure what _that_ means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting distinction, Don. Reminds me somewhat of the Google/Yahoo! dichotomy and the fact that some have said that&#8217;s gendered too &#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree: I consider FB status messages more intimate than Tweets. One big reason is that FB has very different defaults concerning privacy. And, yes, Twitter is very much a medium of self-promotion, whether your audience is 10 friends or 10,000 strangers. Not much different than a blog in that sense.</p>
<p>Though for some crazy reason I think I have more Twitter followers than people who sub to my RSS feed, and I&#8217;ve only ever tweeted once. Not sure what _that_ means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
