Infinite Tolerance

I knew the numbers but I just now realized what the numbers really meant.  Only 10% or less of e-mails I get daily are legitimate e-mails.  90% are spams and viruses.

10%!!!

I agree with Jon Udell that RSS is not a replacement for e-mails and that e-mail has special powers, but e-mail infrastructure is clearly broken.

As noted by some, SpamBayes tend to throw e-mails written in non-English language into the spam pile.  The other day, my little spirit-brother (brother not of birth) in Korea called me to ask why I haven't responded to his e-mail.  I told him it was SpamBayes' fault.  He said Huh?

Exactly what is going on here?  Infinite tolerance?  What we waiting for before some drastic actions are taken?  1%?  0.1%?

Patents

Tim Bray confesses about having two patents in the pipeline and goes on to talk about software patents.  I also have a couple of security-related patents in the pipeline.  To me, it's not the software patents but patents that violate public's right of passage.

GIF patent was legit but Unisys was standing there and charging toll on what most of us considered public road.  What is public road and what is not?  The distinction is simple.  If your enforcement of the patent hurts your public relations more than it adds to your bottomline, then you are standing on a public road.

To be more precise, if your patent gives your solution advantages in quality of service, then it's legit.  But if your patent leads to the only solution, then you are a troll.  If your patented formula makes cars go faster, I am fine with that.  If you patented the idea of automobiles, I am not all right with that and all for public's right to steamroll over such patents.

My justification is this.  Since patent laws can be changed or even banished by the people, the people has the right to selectively change or banish any specific patent it chooses.  Implementation is problematic, but the principle is sound IMHO.

MIT/Stanford Venture Lab Event Tonight

As I mentioned last week, I'll be at Stanford tonight.  Online registration for the event is sold-out but you can still walk-in for a few dollars more.  It starts at 6PM.  Ciao.

Update:

It's 9PM and I am back.  I got there a bit late only to find that the first hour was 'social networking' time with food and drink.  I had already eaten dinner, so I stood there with Heinekin in my hand.  Lots of VCs showed up, but even they couldn't quite explain why.

My old VC pal, Robert Simon of Alta Parnters showed up and couldn't explain his presence either.  I asked him if he would invest in a social software and he promptly answered no.  He probably saw that I was about to launch into a fevered pitch.  Heehee.  Gee, Robert.  Tacit.com looks awfully like a social software company.

I saw some media folks there too but only Bambi Francisco from MarketWatch caught my eyes.  I gave her some quotes and got her interested in blogging.  Cool.  I would love to see her blog.  Marc Canter was there as well to ask questions.  I gave him one of my Heinekin so he can lube up.

The session itself wasn't that interesting to me.  Nothing new was being talked about although I thought Ross Mayfield explaining wiki as a enterprise software got some people's eyes twinkling.  Jonathan Abrams of Friendster made some funny comments.  Andrew Anker of August Capital, the VC of the panel and a fellow blogger, made some down to earth, post-bubble statements.

Cynthia Typaldos' comment about her group of 4000 marketing professionals being able to meet their social networking needs with just email, blogs, and eGroup.  No special social networking tools needed.  I agree with her.  Social networking in itself is not compelling enough beyond dating.  Social networking is, for most people, passive and incidental activity.  I tried LinkedIn, Friendster, and other social networking services but there was no compelling need for me to keeping going back to it.

I left early because I had to go to restroom and it was too much trouble to crawl back to my seat.  So I acted like I had another important meeting to go to.  Heh.

Reminder to self: get Bambi a blog.  Isn't it funny how I am using my blog as PostIt now?

Lineage II

Lineage II is coming.  Lineage was a huge hit in Korea with millions of players taking adventage of broadband network in Korea.  Lineage differs from other MMORPG in that it actively encouraged building large social groups and large scale battles between them (Socialwarfareware!).  Still, the original Lineage was a isometric which is less immersive than full 3D.  Lineage II makes up for it by building on UnrealEngine2 and the result is impressive.

Where the hell is Starbucks in this town?

Check out the Castle Siege gameplay movie (105mb WMV) and others at Lineage II Movies section.  While Lineage battles are smaller than real world battles, it really feels like a real battle with swirling chaos and spirits soaring or plummeting in an eye blink.  Amazing stuff.  It will be interesting to see if Lineage II with it's strong social features can take off in America.

Skyping

Just got Skype.  Try Skyping me using the Skype button under my portrait.  There has been some problem finding people so Skype might be mostly hype.  It's VoIP technology might be up to snuff, but it sure is difficult finding anyone to talk to.  If situation doesn't change, it's being uninstalled after a few days.  Yipes!

10th Don

According to Google, I am the 10th Don.  Ahead of me are:

  1. Don Johnston, an educational software company
  2. Don Knuth, still at Stanford
  3. Don Lemmon, author of a bestselling nutritionist
  4. Don Norman, Mr. Everyday Things.
  5. Don Nickles, US Senator
  6. Don't Panic Eat Organic (?)
  7. Don Quijote, an In-Country Spanish language school
  8. Don't Link to Us!, the anti-stupid-linking-policty group
  9. Don Box's blog

Not bad.  Notables immediately behind me are:

  1. Don Young, Congressman for all Alaska
  2. Don Conoscenti, a musician
  3. Don Balón, a world-famous soccer player
  4. Don Aka, a 31 year-old farm boy with a blog

It will be tough to knock Don Box out of the way, but rest should be a cinch.  Muhahahaha!  When I am near the top, I'll link to Don Knuth so I can keep him ahead of me just like I am keeping Safari WebCore source code link above the blog-waterline.

FYI, blog-waterline is my term for link rank level at which the blog effect stops.  If your link is above the waterline, you are really popular.  But then the waterline keeps rising and may place the whole Google underwater.

Update:

I just removed links to other Dons because my linking to them will keep them ahead of me.  Duh!  To find them, use the first link to Google search result page.

Books, Bookshelves, and Changes

Today, I had a need to write some crypto using OpenSSL and noticed that there was an O'Reilly book Network Security with OpenSSL.  I should have that I said.  Amazon had it for $27.97.  Barnes & Noble had it for $31.96.  I wanted to read it tonight.  So I called around and found one at Redwood City Barnes & Noble.  Weather was hot so I took my wife and son along.  When I got there and looked over the book, I noticed for the first time the list price: $39.95.

For the longest time, I used to visit bookstores like clockwork.  At least once a week.  Stacy's and Stanford Bookstore on University Ave used to be my favorite.  I must have dropped at least four figures at those bookstores over the years.  Then I stopped going and started buying over the Web.  My buying habit changed right away.  Instead of walking in with no particularly book in mind and walking out with a stack of newly interested books to read, I started ordering books on-demand, meaning AFTER I got interested.

I also stopped looking at the list prices.  Net result is that I am no longer willing to pay the list price for a book, not even one I want to read tonight.  Instead of paying $12 more than I need to, I am subscribing to O'Reilly's Safari Bookshelf.  Starter account with five book slot (concurrent access) is $10 per month or $110 per year.

I think it's a reasonable deal for average books, but not for keepers like the OpenSSL book.  Oh, well.  I am getting two weeks free so maybe I'll change again during that time and turn into a Safari maniac.  It's funny how seemingly drastic changes sneaks up on us and life moves on.

Update:

Looking ahead, I don't think bookstores will disappear but they will become showrooms for newly published books like the way car showrooms display the latest cars.  New books won't have a lot of peer reviews so best places to check them out will be at the bookstores.

Each book will have an RFID tag so ordering the book you like is as simple as taking the book upto a terminal to display the price and pressing a flashing red button.  At this point, your identity device (cellphone or Visa card) will beep asking you to confirm.  Acknowledge with a click and the order is sent.

Since bookstores needs to carry only a single copy of newly released books, wider variety of books will become available for browsing.  Clerks' will be freed from point of sales only to be kept busy returning books to the shelves.  RFID privacy concern is irrelevant in these bookstores because they will not leave the store.

As I mentioned above, book buying will become more on-demand and less impulse-based, so the business of creating demand will thrive.  Some of that demand will be created by professional book reviewers who sell their service/content to specialty book-peddlers like Amazon affiliates.

Since most of the profit will be in pre-order period in this scenario, book publishers will be able to predict demand much more accurately than before, affecting number of copies printed as well as raising the number of cancelled publications.  This in turn will bring authors, reviewers, and specialty book-peddlers together in a tigher working relationship to ensure greater demand.

Nice pile of bullsh*t, no?

Measuring Effects of Meditation

NY Times article Is Buddhism Good for Your Health? (registeration necessary) is a good read.  It talks about the efforts by U of Wisconsin neuroscientists to study effects of meditation scientifically with help from Tibetan Buddhist monks.

The Wisconsin researchers, for example, are focusing on three common forms of Buddhist meditation.

One is focused attention, where they specifically train themselves to focus on a single object for long periods of time.

The second area is where they voluntarily cultivate compassion. It's something they do every day, and they have special exercises where they envision negative events, something that causes anger or irritability, and then transform it and infuse it with an antidote, which is compassion.

The third is called 'open presence.'  It is a state of being acutely aware of whatever thought, emotion or sensation is present, without reacting to it.  They describe it as pure awareness.

I have done all three types of meditations in the past but found some problems in practicing them everyday.

First problem is the lack of compelling need to create the necessary discipline.  Being deeply hurt emotionally and release from the pain is a good enough, but I am no serious wounds like that, just minor half-healed scars.  Lacking why makes it difficult to keep doing it.

Second problem is the detachement from life that results.  For example, I can look at a baby and, with an effort, erase all effects of my vision such as warmth and love.  It's not an easy effort and maintaining the state takes a lot of practice like trying to balance oneself on a razor's edge.  Still, doing it leaves me empty, not happy, like one feels after reading a stack of Existentialism books.

Process is different from desensitization, but the effect is similar.  It's like shattering a vase, erasing the essense of the vase and emptying its content.  I think the voluntary cultivation of compassion is the attempt to glue the vase back.  Maybe the professional monks know better, but I am not sure if the result is as good as new.

Another thing is that mind and body sometimes acts separately.  When my dog died, I felt emotional pain so I shut part of my mind down.  Meditation is great for emergencies.  But I found tears running down my calm stony face.  Cocooned, I felt no sadness but tears ran like river.  Yes, that was a weird experience.

The last problem was the mentioned in the article.

The fact that the brain can learn, adapt and molecularly resculpture itself on the basis of experience and training suggests that meditation may leave a biological residue in the brain — a residue that, with the increasing sophistication of new technology, might be captured and measured.

No kidding.  I believe that every action one takes, everything one sees, hear, smell and touch, every word one utters, and every thought one has changes us in body and mind.  Hit someone in the face once, you change.  Read Koran or Bible, you change.  Look at a flower, you change.  Everything changes us, but meditation can affect one as strongly as trauma or life long abuse can.  Powerful stuff.

I think the research is a Good Thing because people will finally learn the real benefits as well as dangers of meditation.

Ray Ozzie Slashes Patent-Troll-Wannabe Eolas

When I first heard of Eolas being awarded half a billion dollars against Microsoft over some idiotically obvious plugin embedding patent, I thought the case had no merit and would eventually go away.  Well, it hasn't to my surprise.  Even worse, it's going to affect browser users as well as developers.

Ray Ozzie wades into the fight with his Saving the Browser post in which he demostrates convincingly and meticulously why he thinks Lotus Notes R3 is a prior art that voids Eolas's patent.  I am convinced and appreciate Ray's considerable effort in foiling Eolas.  While Eolas is not a patent troll in the strictest sense, it sure is starting to stink like one with this silly patent.